Sure, just let me know when I can test

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:07 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Hi Vincente!
> There have been a few subtle details. Mostly in the area of EAR support.
> OpenEJB uses some internal classes from OWB. And some of those got
> refactored to improve performance to use the NotifiactionManager directly.
> But this meant that some events did not get sent to Observers registered in
> EAR/lib jars. I've fixed that now with introducing a
> WebappNotificationManager and moved the delegation logic of events over
> from the BeanManager.With that change all the TCKs within our main build
> are green again.
> And yes, will also upgrade OpenJPA and release it soon.
>
> But it would be way cool if you could test the current master with your
> app and give some feedback!But let me first update OpenEJB for the latest
> xbean-asm9 as well.
> Will ping back when done.
> txs and LieGrue,strub
>
>     On Tuesday, 2 March 2021, 16:22:44 CET, Vicente Rossello <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> I made a PR some time ago with updates in xbean-asm, OWB and CXF to support
> jdk 16 (no refactors, just upgrades).  It's working fine with JDK 16 on our
> application (excluding openJPA).
>
> The only problem right now is that OpenJPA is using xbean-asm8, but a
> snapshot will do as well.
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/693
> Just in case it helps a bit.
>
> Best regards,
> Vicente.
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:07 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > hi there!
> >
> > I'm right now in the middle of some refactoring to update TomEE8 to the
> > latest OWB version.
> > I also did need to tweak some internals to better deal with eventing for
> > EARs.
> > It's mostly corner cases like making sure that things like
> > ProcessInjectionPoint triggered by InjectionFactory#createInjectionTarget
> > also end up in parent EAR libs.
> > Right now running the full build with all the TCKs. The CDI TCKs do all
> > pass again already.
> >
> > Will keep you updated...
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to