Hi @all, we have some progress related to a pure JUnit 5 application composers extension, see [1].
Would be good to get some additional feedback on it. Already received a lot of valuable feedback by @rmannibucau (thx), which is already incorporated in the current PR. Gruss Richard - [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/767 Am Montag, den 08.03.2021, 11:41 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > I did a quick check: > > Arquillian is supporting JUnit 5 since 1.7.0-Alpha5. I created a Jira > [1] and added two examples (see PR @ [2]), which are using JUnit 5 > only > for Arquillian-based testing. > > ApplicationComposer relies on JUnit4 Code. Thus, a > ApplicationComposer > JUnit5-Extension would be necessary. I created a Jira [3] for it. > Might > find some time working on it in the next weeks :) > > Gruss > Richard > > - [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2976 > - [2] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/765 > - [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2977 > > > > Am Montag, den 08.03.2021, 09:51 +0000 schrieb Bruno Baptista: > > Thanks Jean-Louis, Richard! > > > > > > On 08/03/21 08:44, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > yes, I did some work related to JUnit5 for the old (legacy) code > > > (via > > > InitialContext, see [1]), which shouldnt be used anymore but > > > hinders > > > some users to migrate to JUnit5 (who are using the legacy > > > approach). > > > This PR is merged into master and will be available with the next > > > release. > > > > > > However, this does not necessarily apply to Arquillian / > > > ApplicationComposer code. > > > > > > I might find some time looking at Arquillian / > > > ApplicationComposer > > > code > > > related to JUnit5. Afaik, Arquillian did not support JUnit5 for > > > quite a > > > long time. However, since 1.7.0.Alpha5 [2], it should be > > > included, > > > so > > > we could definitley take a look at it and check, if we need to > > > adjust > > > something. However, there is no 1.7.0 release available yet. > > > > > > Gruss > > > Richard > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/759 > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-core/issues/137#issuecomment-536316718 > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, den 08.03.2021, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis > > > Monteiro: > > > > Hi Bruno, > > > > > > > > I think Richard worked on it. > > > > Not sure about the status, but as far as I can recall, he > > > > created > > > > a > > > > ticket > > > > (TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module) and a PR for it. > > > > -- > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:11 PM brunobat <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All! > > > > > 2 years have passed. Any news about this? > > > > > Can we now test with Arquillian and TomEE with JUnit 5? > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Bruno Baptista > > > > > https://twitter.com/brunobat_ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sent from: > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
