> > IMO the following is the best way: > - branch 8.0.x > - make master 9.0 and rename javax -> jakarta > - branch 9.0 after everything is working fine > - working on 10.0 in master > - maintain 8.0 and 10.0 and dont maintain the 9.0 branch
+1 In terms of how we handle 9.x, I think we'd want to stay on top of any > CVEs in that release for at least 6 months after 10 goes final so people > have at least a little time to transition +1 By merging both opinions above, the following would be a potential set of steps: - branch 8.0.x - make master 9.0 and rename javax -> jakarta - maintain 8.0 and 9.0 (master) - When 10 is out, keep 10 in master and branch 9.0. - Maintain 8, 9, and master (10) El mar, 5 oct 2021 a las 15:31, David Blevins (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > On Oct 5, 2021, at 1:59 AM, Thomas Andraschko < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > yep > > i think we have to maintain 8.0.x anyway as its the last javax release > and > > we cant expect that everyone does a fast migration > > > > IMO the following is the best way: > > - branch 8.0.x > > - make master 9.0 and rename javax -> jakarta > > - branch 9.0 after everything is working fine > > - working on 10.0 in master > > - maintain 8.0 and 10.0 and dont maintain the 9.0 branch > > Agree with making 8 be the branch and 9 be main/master. In terms of how > we handle 9.x, I think we'd want to stay on top of any CVEs in that release > for at least 6 months after 10 goes final so people have at least a little > time to transition over. > > > -David > > > > > > > > Am Di., 5. Okt. 2021 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > [email protected]>: > > > >> Agreed ... > >> > >> 1.7.x - EOL > >> 7.0.x and 7.1.x - mostly similar so if we maintain one, we should > maintain > >> the other. > >> > >> But I agree that 1 actively developed version (TomEE master/TomEE 9.x) > and > >> 1 maintained version (TomEE 8.x) is good. > >> That'd be my choice. > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 10:37 AM Zowalla, Richard < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> I am wondering, if we still maintain 7.0.x, 7.1.x in the future (1.7.x > >>> is eol, I guess) ? Maintenance cost will rise with every additional > >>> version branch. The last releases of 7.0.x and 7.1.x are 1 year old... > >>> but this is maybe another discussion. > >>> > >>> > >>> Am Dienstag, dem 05.10.2021 um 10:05 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > >>>> Thanks everyone. > >>>> > >>>> Same feeling here. > >>>> I think we tried and pushed it as much as we could. > >>>> > >>>> What we can do is make sure we fix remaining failures on TCK and > >>>> support > >>>> JDK 17 with TomEE. > >>>> Do a release, branch for maintenance and move master to jakarta. > >>>> > >>>> Does it sound like an acceptable plan? > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM David Jencks <[email protected] > >>>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Maybe even “Our second release _confirmed_…”… > >>>>> > >>>>> David Jencks > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:33 PM, David Blevins < > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> - Our first release proved releasing both 8 & 9 together can be > >>>>> impractical. The TomEE 8 binaries were a dud, only TomEE 9 was > >>>>> released. > >>>>> There was communication overhead and made for a potentially > >>>>> confusing > >>>>> release. The TomEE 9 binaries are still very limited. > >>>>>>> - Our first release proved releasing both 8 & 9 together can be > >>>>> impractical. The TomEE 8 binaries were released, we didn't release > >>>>> TomEE > >>>>> 9. It's the second time we've done that. We've only managed one > >>>>> TomEE 9 > >>>>> release in the last 10 months. > >>>>>> This was supposed to start "our second > >>>>>> release". CopyPasteException :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -David > >>>>>> > >>> -- > >>> Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > >>> Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > >>> > >>> Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > >>> Max-Planck-Str. 39 > >>> D-74081 Heilbronn > >>> phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar) > >>> mail: [email protected] > >>> web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > >>> > >> > > -- Atentamente: César Hernández.
