+1 to move on

i would also like to get another 8.0.x release but i will send another mail
soon :)

Am Di., 8. Feb. 2022 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
[email protected]>:

> Hi all,
>
> I am strongly +1 for moving forward with it, i.e. time to move on with
> master.
>
> There is definitley the need for some artifacts (arquillian, app
> composer), which are not covered by the byte-code approach and which
> are required to migrate (fully w/o byte code transformation) to the
> jakarta namespace :)
>
> Although - I think it is clear to everyone - the 8.x branch will
> (obviously) stay for a couple of years as it is the last javax
> namespace supporting release.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 08.02.2022 um 00:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We have discussed it a couple of times here and there. I'd like to
> > open a
> > dedicated thread for it.
> >
> > EE 9 has been released and we have created a TomEE 9.x milestone to
> > pass
> > the TCK. The approach to do bytecode changes to support javax ->
> > jakarta
> > namespace changes proved to work but it's also been more complex than
> > expected. We have a limited fork with limited features. We don't
> > support
> > nearly as much as we do in the 8.x branch.
> >
> > The goal was to decrease the maintenance cost for the community, but
> > in
> > reality I fear we are on the opposite path.
> >
> > I'd like to create a TomEE 8.x maintenance branch where we keep
> > fixing
> > stuff, upgrading libraries and do as many releases as possible and as
> > long
> > as we can to support javax namespace. I know it's the last compatible
> > version so the topic is not when TomEE is going to be EOL.
> >
> > But if we do that, we could move master to TomEE 9 and start merging
> > back
> > all changes we did in the fork and finally create an EE 9 final
> > release.
> >
> > EE 10 is around the corner, if we want to keep supporting EE and
> > being
> > certified, we need to avoid big jumps.
> >
> > What does the community think?
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Reply via email to