FYI: Lists removes image attachments, sadly. Am Dienstag, dem 15.02.2022 um 11:09 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Continuing with this thread so hopefully all discussions are located > in the same place. > > I'm sorry for the spam and so many questions/discussions. > > I pushed again some more changes using the Jakarta BOM file and all > versions inside. So it's a bit more exhaustive. > We still have some javax dependencies in there we need to prune or > remove and replace if needed. Jakarta pruned a couple of APIs so > there aren't required anymore maybe > > > I'll start using them and see how it builds with my branch work for > TomEE 9.x > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:02 AM Zowalla, Richard < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks to you both! > > > > Am Montag, dem 14.02.2022 um 23:26 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis > > Monteiro: > > > I'd probably agree. > > > > > > I went and pushed a merged version with > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api/commit/fcaa0bb099cb06b6ca59a330a76c194185128372 > > > The feature for OSGI still needs some love and I have to review > > and > > > replace > > > remaining Geronimo specs were we have jakarta equivalents. > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:06 PM David Blevins < > > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 14, 2022, at 4:42 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I did a pom.xml comparison and it looks like in > > > > tomee-jakarta/jakartaee-api > > > > > module you used most of the jakarta.xxx dependencies as > > opposed > > > > > to the > > > > > usual Geronimo specs. > > > > > Is there a reason? > > > > > > > > I don't recall off the top of my head, but I suspect it was > > that we > > > > didn't > > > > have jakarta versions of the Geronimo API jars and some APIs > > were > > > > updated > > > > slightly, like EJB, so a straight translation would hit > > issues. I > > > > think it > > > > was a "I don't want to deal with this now" move. > > > > > > > > > > > > We could use either, though there is no longer the licensing > > > > restriction > > > > that forced us to create the Geronimo API jars in the first > > place. > > > > > > > > Were it me, I'd continue to use the jars which are > > implementations > > > > (javamail, activation, etc), but the others that are pure APIs, > > I'm > > > > not > > > > sure it's worth the effort. > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
