Hi Thomas, Please see below some comments. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 4:30 PM Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> wrote: > JFYI: > my colleague implemented the Johnzon polymorphism feature and he will try > to get all TCK tests running > I reviewed with Romain and we merged. I need to run the entire TCK again and I'll trigger a release asap if it passes. > > So whats left: > - Johnzon: wait and run release > - BVal: run release > Discussed with Mark as well in a separate thread. We should do a release. I'm happy to do it as well. > - CXF: 4.0 is already released? So just integration missing? > Yes, but integration is tricky and the upgrade will take a bit of time. The trick is that they don't care about TCK so I don't know where we are. > - OWB: ? > Mark started. We have a few challenges created and accepted. We have other things to fix in order to pass the TCK. > - BatchEE: ? > Mark also started on this one, but I'm not sure about the current status. I think the upgrade broke a lot of APIs. Some modules will be pruned as well. > - OpenJPA: no commits, also OpenJPA doesnt implement all 2.2 features. > Mark or Romain, do you have any update on this one? I must say I have no idea. > Shouldnt we just replace it with EclipseLink as default? > > > Am So., 2. Apr. 2023 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]>: > > > Johnzon is already transitioned to Jakarta. The TCK is already set up. Si > > go ahead if you have some time. Il at DevNexus this week but I can > > definitely trigger a release for bval. > > > > Le dim. 2 avr. 2023, 11:11, Thomas Andraschko < > [email protected] > > > > > a écrit : > > > > > I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff. > > > > > > MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first time since ever > > > propably. > > > > > > bval: maybe you can trigger a release? > > > > > > About OpenJPA: i dont think the work has been started. Propably we > should > > > just switch to Eclipse-Link. > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 2. Apr. > > > 2023, 16:51: > > > > > > > I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move > > > forward. > > > > > > > > CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and > the > > > TCK > > > > which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and > > get > > > > challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec. > > > > > > > > BVal is close or compliant. > > > > BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling. > > And > > > > some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta > equivalent. > > > > MyFaces should be done > > > > > > > > OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap > > > > CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some > integration > > > > time. > > > > > > > > Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to > > > > implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already. > > > > > > > > On top of my head, this is where we are. > > > > -- > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Don't know the current status. > > > > > > > > > > JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there > > are > > > > > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?). > > > > > > > > > > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though. > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas > > Andraschko: > > > > > > Is there any further progress? > > > > > > Are there depedencies still not ready? > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., > 10. > > > > > > Feb. > > > > > > 2023, 10:33: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x. > > > > > > > It's > > > > > > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang > > > > > > > operation > > > > > > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, > but > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully > > > > > > > green as > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby > > > > > > > steps > > > > > > > without breaking the build for a very long time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big > PR > > > > > > > and I'll > > > > > > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they > are > > > > > > > green > > > > > > > before they are merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR > some > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green > > state. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
