Jon triggered a run on tck.work for that branch [1] (thx!!) and we have
only 4 regressions from the upgrade.

Will have a look into those failures and see, if I can find out
something useful.


[1]
https://tck.work/tomee/tests?path=com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs&build=1692359054645&status=FAILED


Am Freitag, dem 18.08.2023 um 11:47 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Now I actually also ran my local setup again with 9.1.1-SNAPSHOT
> which
> we know passes the TCK for EE 9.1.
> 
> The result is:  2708 | 95
> 
> This suggests that my local setup is a bit wonky as the same tests
> are
> failing ;)
> 
> It would be great if someone could take my CXF4 branch and run the EE
> 9.1 TCK against it once.
> 
> Gruß
> Richard
> 
> Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 17:29 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I've been doing some work to get rid of our cxf-shade and migrate
> > > to
> > > cxf 4.0.2. The branch is here: [1].
> > > 
> > > Our own build is in progess and I expect some failures due to
> > > missed
> > > dependencies in test setups: [2]
> > > 
> > > I did run the jaxrs part of the TCK (ee91) against my branch
> > > locally
> > > and it looks promising but (as expected) we have some TCK
> > > regressions
> > > (*meh*):
> > > 
> > > Completed running 2803 tests (1:34:15.098):
> > > 
> > >     Passed: 2706
> > >     Failed: 97
> > >     Errors: 0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In the past, my local tck setup sometimes failed for tests, which
> > > >
> > > were
> > > ok on other systems. Maybe someone can confirm, that these tests
> > > are
> > > actually failing for them too? Here is my list: [3]
> > > 
> > > For reference I did run
> > > 
> > > rm -rf target/ && ./runtests -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2 --
> > > ee91 > -
> > > j --env -nc -c -w tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs
> > > 
> > > Any feedback welcome.
> > > 
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/rzo1/tomee/tree/cxf4
> > > [2]
> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pull-request-manual/15
> > > [3] https://gist.github.com/rzo1/efbfbf568e7101842d3ffab2fdb38a3b
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to