So if no one was interested since ~ 2012 (no bug reports, etc.), should n't we just remove it?
Am Dienstag, dem 12.12.2023 um 07:05 -0800 schrieb David Blevins: > Those we there for Geronimo's benefit as it became osgi-based in the > last few years it was around. I suspect they've not consistently > been updated after around 2012. > > > -David > > > On Nov 9, 2023, at 4:51 AM, Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Seems we do need to update our OSGi import declarations? > > view- > > source:https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/openejb- > > core/9.1.1/openejb-core-9.1.1.pom > > > > org.apache.openejb.jee.wls;version="[4.0,5)", > > org.apache.openejb.loader;version="[4.0,5)", > > org.apache.openejb.client;bundle- > > version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, > > org.apache.openejb.client.proxy;bundle- > > version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, > > org.apache.openejb.client.java;bundle- > > version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, > > org.openejb.client;bundle- > > version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, > > > > org.apache.openjpa.event;resolution:=optional;version="[2.1,3)", > > > > org.apache.openjpa.persistence;resolution:=optional;version="[2.1,3 > > )", > > org.apache.webbeans.annotation;version="[1.1,2)", > > org.apache.webbeans.component;version="[1.1,2)", > > org.apache.webbeans.component.creation;version="[1.1,2)", > > org.apache.webbeans.config;version="[1.1,2)", > > Sounds really outdated to me. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
