Hi all,

we need some more (binding) votes :)

Gruß
Richard

On 2025/12/09 12:10:46 Markus Jung wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> - sigs/hashes are OK
> - our internal applications with jdk25 run well on this build (using 
> CDI, Faces, JPA with Hibernate, JAX-RS, security, concurrency, MP 
> config/health/restclient)
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Markus
> 
> On 12/7/25 16:38, Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I’d like to start a vote on releasing the artifacts for TomEE 10.1.3 below. 
> > It mainly contains dependency updates and some improvements.
> >
> > Here are the facts:
> > - Maven repo: 
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1242/
> > - Binaries & source: 
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1242/tomee-10.1.3/
> > - Tag: https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/tomee-project-10.1.3 
> > (54b4e05b62ceac87fbd7b776f877e9740af2848e)
> >
> >
> > Full release notes:
> >
> > Improvement
> > [TOMEE-4518] - Remove transaction propagation
> > [TOMEE-4528] - Getting Warning logs for Java 21 with TomEE 10.1.1
> > [TOMEE-4531] - Include dependencyManagement section in BOMs
> >
> > Dependency upgrade
> > [TOMEE-4532] - Bouncy Castle 1.82
> > [TOMEE-4533] - Mojarra 4.0.12
> > [TOMEE-4534] - Smallrye Config 3.14.0
> > [TOMEE-4535] - EclipseLink 4.0.8
> > [TOMEE-4539] - ASM 9.9
> > [TOMEE-4540] - Geronimo Mail 1.0.2
> > [TOMEE-4541] - MP Config 3.14.1
> > [TOMEE-4542] - slf4j2 2.0.17
> > [TOMEE-4543] - Apache Geronimo XBean 4.28
> > [TOMEE-4545] - Jackson 2.20.1
> > [TOMEE-4546] - Quartz 2.5.1
> > [TOMEE-4550] - CXF 4.1.4
> > [TOMEE-4551] - wss4j 4.0.1
> > [TOMEE-4552] - Tomcat 10.1.49
> > [TOMEE-4553] - ActiveMQ 6.2.0
> > [TOMEE-4554] - Commons CLI 1.11.0
> > [TOMEE-4555] - bcprov 1.83
> > [TOMEE-4556] - commons-lang3 3.20.0
> > [TOMEE-4557] - commons-io 2.21.0
> > [TOMEE-4559] - commons codec 1.20.0
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go ship it
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h or as long as needed.
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> 

Reply via email to