Thanks for the comment on the PR. Very valuable and full of details :) I agree, that a TCK would be valuable for EE11 - as far as I can see, the old test harness is history? From what I can see in the EE11 TCK, it is all Maven + JUnit5 + Arquillian now ? That would be awesome …
Gruß Richard > Am 13.01.2026 um 02:53 schrieb David Blevins <[email protected]>: > > Short version is there is a leak that causes the hander references of > Stateful beans to stay in the Handler registry even after the bean's @Remove > method is called. > > The fix, however, doesn't work as it relies on the @Remove annotation being > present on the interface class which is not legal per spec. We have a > warning we issue when people do that. > > I dig back as far as I could (like 2001) to refresh my memory and I'm not > sure we actually need the handler registry. For 11 we may actually want to > try removing it. We'd need a good TCK setup however as it might have some > impact on compliance. Or rather it would bring a lot of confidence really > fast if we knew some basic stuff wasn't breaking. > > If we can get away without it, that whole code would certainly be much > simpler. > > > -David > >> On Jan 11, 2026, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I’ll try to take a look tomorrow. I’d be surprised if there was a bug with >> this. >> >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 10:39 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> There is an open PR related to EJB3: >>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2408 >>> Can someone with some XP in that area have a look at it ? Might be >>> relevant for 10.x / 11.x >>> >>> Gruß >>> Richard >
