Great. Looks like you can now try to run the full ejb suite :)
> Am 25.01.2026 um 15:29 schrieb kartik sirigeri <[email protected]>:
>
> @rzo1,
> that seemed to work,
> ===============================================================================
>
> 1/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest1
> - PASSED
> 2/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest2
> - PASSED
> 3/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest3
> - PASSED
> 4/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest4
> - PASSED
> 5/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest5
> - PASSED
> 6/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest1
> - PASSED
> 7/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest2
> - PASSED
> 8/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest3
> - PASSED
> 9/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest4
> - PASSED
> 10/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest5
> - PASSED
> 11/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByValueTest
> - PASSED
> 12/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest1
> - PASSED
> 13/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest2
> - PASSED
> 14/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest3
> - PASSED
> 15/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest4
> - PASSED
> 16/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest5
> - PASSED
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Completed running 16 tests (0:00:33.670):
>
> Passed: 16
> Failed: 0
> Errors: 0
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Regards
> Kartik Sirigeri
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 13:23, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes - it might be required to do some more changes (aside from the update
>> on the version of TomEE). Best would be to keep all your changes on a
>> branch, so we can PR the ASF repo later.
>>
>> Regarding the issue: The lib is now called
>>
>> libre-wsdl4j-1.12.0.jar
>>
>> I think, that you need to update CommandSupport.groovy#263 to match the
>> new pattern.
>>
>> Gruß
>> Richard
>>
>>> Am 25.01.2026 um 07:36 schrieb kartik sirigeri <[email protected]
>>> :
>>>
>>> Hi @rzo1, <>
>>>
>>> I tried running the tck, but it failed. It looks like it is looking up
>> for wsdl jars, attached the log for the command ./runtests --web
>> tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.localaccess.statelessclient.
>>> I had to make a small change in pom.xml to run.
>>> changed the below,
>>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>>> <tomee.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>>> <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>>> <tomee.zip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>>>
>>> to,
>>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>>> <tomee.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>>> <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>>> <tomee.zip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>>>
>>>
>>> <>
>>> Regards
>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 15:59, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think it was renamed to
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/blob/tomee-10-with-ee-91/setup.sh
>>>> In any case the repo wasn’t touched for a while, so it might need some
>> additional love regarding TomEE 10 dependencies / Java version required to
>> run.
>>>>
>>>> Gruß
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>> Am 24.01.2026 um 05:48 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>
>>>>> @rzo1 let me see if i can get the tck run, so i should be using the
>>>>> branch tomee-10-with-ee-91 to try out? and i could not see
>> setup-tck91.sh
>>>>> in the source as mentioned in the readme.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 00:04, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for stepping up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the first step would be to setup the EJB-related parts of
>> the TCK
>>>>>> located here: https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck
>>>>>> As mentioned by David in one of the comments, the most complete part
>> would
>>>>>> be the EE9.1 TCK since it is already setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think one could try to get it to work with a TomEE 10.1.x first
>> and if
>>>>>> that works out, we can try to remove the registry so we can directly
>> see
>>>>>> any sort of regression.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT? Do you want to give setting up the TCK a try? You are free to
>> ask
>>>>>> any question on the list - someone with xp in that area will surely
>> answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gruß
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.01.2026 um 07:18 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi @dblevins <https://github.com/dblevins> ,
>>>>>>> Starting a new thread for ,
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2408.
>>>>>>> Let me know how I get started with this. Went through the
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p6qht01wjtqfjrywzfkdbk492xkd4ol6 ,
>>>>>>> understand that this registry should be removed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> <log.txt>
