did a few very quick tests and all looks fine.

+1

txs and LieGrue,
strub


> Am 11.06.2026 um 11:38 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 11.0.0-M1.
> 
> This is the 1st milestone release of TomEE 11 targeting JakartaEE 11.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen.
> 
> I would like to emphasise and give a shout out to all our volunteers
> who have been doing the hard work for EE11, which is also being done in all 
> our upstream
> upstream dependencies such as Tomcat, OWB, CXF, MyFaces, etc.
> 
> Notable changes:
> 
> - This is the first TomEE 11 release targeting EE11 and MicroProfile 7.1
> - Bunch of dependency updates due to the move to EE11
> - Passing the standalone TCKs we have setup inside TomEE (Security, 
> Concurrency, Data, REST, MP 7.1, etc.)
> - OpenJPA is still on its TomEE 10 level - the JPA 3.2 PR is not yet included.
> 
> Please note that we do not pass the full EE TCK, nor do we have a fully 
> functional TCK setup at the
> at the moment. However, our own full build is green and so I am happy to
> to call for a vote to release a first milestone of TomEE 11.
> 
> Here are the hard facts:
> 
> ###############
> 
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1252/ 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-12/>
> 
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>tomee-11.0.0-M1-rc1</id>
> <name>Testing TomEE 11.0.0-M1</name>
> <url>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1252/ 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-12/>
> </url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
> 
> ###############
> 
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1252/tomee-11.0.0-M1/
> 
> 
> ###############
> 
> Tag:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/releases/tag/tomee-project-11.0.0-M1
> 
> 07a7ec753e47fad69ade923637c0a6065fbe9416
> 
> ###############
> 
> Release notes:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12356277
> 
> ###############
> 
> Here is an adoc generated version of the changelog as well:
> 
> == New Feature
> 
> [.compact]
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4530[TOMEE-4530] Jakarta 
> EE 11
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4594[TOMEE-4594] Jakarta 
> Data 1.0
> 
> == Bug
> 
> [.compact]
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4569[TOMEE-4569] TomEE 
> Maven Plugin fails in debug mode in Java 22+
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4571[TOMEE-4571] TomEE 
> PLUME 10.1.x -  Decrease in performance (Factor 2 or more).
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4577[TOMEE-4577] Resources 
> with explicit contructor-type set to "String" are broken
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4603[TOMEE-4603] 
> LinkageError in tomee 10.1 with scope="request"
> 
> == Improvement
> 
> [.compact]
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4580[TOMEE-4580] Improve 
> clarity of conf.0008 deployment mismatch error
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4602[TOMEE-4602] 
> Bouncycastle use jdk18on artifacts instead of jdk15to18
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4574[TOMEE-4574] Add 
> exception details to Assembler#postConstructResources(...)
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4610[TOMEE-4610] 
> openejb-client: AuthenticationException from JNDIContext.authenticate() loses 
> RemoteException cause
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4604[TOMEE-4604] Client's 
> HttpConnectionFactory does not strip sslTruststorePassword from outgoing 
> request.
> 
> == Task
> 
> [.compact]
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4600[TOMEE-4600] Remove 
> openejb.cache.cdi-type-resolution-failure / WebAppInjectionResolver 
> - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4570[TOMEE-4570] Align 
> resource and services-jar.xml type definitions with XBean 4.30 fix to prevent 
> implicit resolution
> 
> 
> 
> ###############
> 
> For signature verification, you can check on the example script here:
> https://gist.github.com/rzo1/9fb1ca0d58e1fc982d596f2a94b10b32
> 
> ###############
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] go ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h or as long as needed.
> 
> Gruß
> Richard

Reply via email to