Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2006 12:10 schrieb Jens-Heiner Rechtien:
> autoconf - RE will regenerate 'configure' and commit it. We use a pretty 
> old versions of autconf, I think it 2.59. We like it to always use the 
> same version of autoconf, because this keeps the diffs small and we are 
> least able to quick check of the plausibility of configure. Always using 
> the same version of autoconf is therefore not an absolut must but a 
> convenience. If 2.59 is no longer good enough please tell us which 
> version of autoconf is the agreed on best version nowadays.

I am personally using whatever if up-to-date on my work machine (Debian 
sid/etch).
Which currently is 2.60a.

But 2.59 should work, although it creates hughe diffs.

> PS: A developer needs not to check in 'configure', there is a standing 
> agreement that RE will regenerate it during integration. It has happened 
> that we overlooked it so it never hurts if you commit it, too. A 

Yep. Better go safe. and if you commit it it's easy to give the cws someone for 
testing :)

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to