Hi Martin, On Tuesday 24 April 2007 15:48, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > > Some of the clones might be public, eg. ooo-build. > > if people agree on a push back, only some of the clones needs to be > public, if this should be a pull back public access gets a problem. > > so right now it is no problem to access a cws which has not been > integrated yet and can e.g. do something like tinderbox builds on it. > The other way round hides all development behind corperate firewalls. Is > this something we really want to do ?
I'm not sure that I understand you... CWS is not visible until the developer does 'cvs commit', the git branch is not visible until the developer does 'git push' to the public repository. What is the difference? Regards, Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
