Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Guido Ostkamp wrote:
I also wonder why you are not looking at Mercurial yet
(<http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki>). It has been selected by a
number of projects, e.g. OpenSolaris and Mozilla.
The concept how branches are implemented with Mercurial doesn't fit that
good in OpenOffice.org Developmemnt Model. Since OOo Feature
Development happens on branches in teams and thus branches should be
shareable by all, Mercurial doesn't seems to be the natural choice since
there branches are done in distributed manner.
This was true when we evaluated Mercurial around March. Now Mercurial
has support for "named branches" inside a repository, which at least
theoretically would fit the bill. I'm not sure how well they would work
in our case, the support for named branches is quite new in Mercurial
and I haven't come around to try it out.
It seems that all DSCMs are very actively developed currently, which
makes a final evaluation a bit difficult.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
