Hi Heiner,

On Monday 19 November 2007 14:23, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:

> > I tried to svnsync the repository over http. The results were quite
> > disappointing, after about one hour runtime, I had only fetched 17 (yes,
> > seventeen) changesets. As far as I can see the repository contains over
> > 500000 changesets.
> >
> > During that time, I had always plenty of CPU% available and the network
> > (DSL-2000) also had a lot of capacity left.
> >
> > After one hour I decided to stopped it. My local repo with the 17
> > changesets now has a 'du -k' size of 69356.
> >
> > Do you have an explanation for this bad behaviour?
>
> The first 20 or so changesets contains extraordinarily much stuff, as it
> represents they first complete import in CVS in 2000. That said, the
> repository is still huge. It's probably bigger than necessary, but a
> real repository will grow anyway.
>
> 69 MBytes in one hour over DSL2000 is not good enough (no matter which
> SCM we choose). I'll check if the apache2 on the server might be the
> bottleneck.

So far, my svn synchronization which I started on Friday is at about revision 
117000 (it failed over the weekend, and I restarted it today in the morning); 
so does not look too optimistic either :-(  [It's over a faster line than 
DSL].

Regards,
Jan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to