Hi Takashi,

Takashi Ono wrote:

In message "Re: [tools-dev] Requirement for DEV300 build-Win32",
Oliver Bolte wrote...
 >the .Net 2003 compiler doesn't support the new manifest mechanism for
 >Windows Vista. You will run from one workaround into the next workaround.
 >I don't think that a self assembled .Net 2003 compiler / Vista SDK
 >configuration will work as a good reference for your MingW port project
 >to eliminate side-effects, because the side-effects of such a
 >configuration itself haven't been investigated.

Will you please give me a pointer to a simple description of the new manifest mechanism?

have a look here:
http://robgarrett.com/cs/blogs/software/archive/2007/01/04/windows-vista-uac-further-reading.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/kennykerr/archive/2006/09/29/Windows-Vista-for-Developers-_1320_-Part-4-_1320_-User-Account-Control.aspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa375365(VS.85).aspx


If it is the case why don't we change the version requirements of compiler version in config_office to force builders to switch to .NET 2008?

I think thats a very good idea for the DEV300 code line.
.Net 2005 Express doesn't contain redistributable runtime librarys,
but .Net 2008 Express includes them and its linker has
a better manifest support.
The dependency to ATL needs to be removed asap., of course.

Takashi Ono (tono)


Oliver

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to