Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Just a reminder that the next chat is scheduled for Friday, June 6, 2008, 09:00--10:00 UTC (11:00--12:00 CEST) on irc://freenode/ooopackaging.

-Stephan

And the transcript:

[2008-06-06 10:57:43] <pmladek> Good morning
[2008-06-06 11:00:09] <sb> Good morning.
[2008-06-06 11:01:08] <sb> Seems interest is declining... Anything you might want to discuss?
[2008-06-06 11:02:02] <xiuzhi> hi all
[2008-06-06 11:02:50] <pmladek> I actully don't have anything interesting. I spent last month with openSUSE--11.0 and SLED10-SP2, ... [2008-06-06 11:03:00] <pmladek> Though, kendy would like to discuss something. [2008-06-06 11:03:03] -->| kendy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/suse/x-c0fc9c2f129050a7) has joined #ooopackaging
[2008-06-06 11:03:10] <kendy> Hi!
[2008-06-06 11:04:56] <kendy> sb: Stephan, I have a small feature request for the 3layer OOo - if reasonable, etc. ;-) [2008-06-06 11:05:31] <kendy> sb: Do you think it would be possible to add configure switches for the location of ure, brand, and basis? [2008-06-06 11:05:37] <xiuzhi> sb: We have known how to split the runtime dll related to every feature. Now we are working on split the cxx file . Do you have any idea about this?
[2008-06-06 11:05:54] <xiuzhi> sorry, kendy, you first
[2008-06-06 11:06:38] <kendy> sb: We're currently patching scp2 to get something like <inst>/ure, <inst>/basis3.0, and <inst> containing the brand directly. [2008-06-06 11:07:25] <kendy> sb: [instead of <inst>/openoffice.org3.0/ for brand, <inst>/openoffice.org/ure, and <inst>/openoffice.org/basis3.0
[2008-06-06 11:07:27] <kendy> ]
[2008-06-06 11:07:41] <kendy> sb: Let me show you the patch - quite a hack ;-) [2008-06-06 11:07:56] <sb> kendy: guess that would be doable, Ingo should know where exactly changes are necessary in scp2/setup_native/insetsetoo_native (he is currently on vactation), so I would suggest you contact him directly (and do the dirty work in configure.in) [2008-06-06 11:08:45] <kendy> sb: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/dev300/scp2-3layer-nicer-paths.diff?revision=12709&view=markup [2008-06-06 11:09:46] <kendy> sb: OK, thanks! - I'd do most of that myself, but I'm not really sure what this 'Target' etc. means, so... ;-) [2008-06-06 11:10:12] <sb> kendy: yeah, as I said, best discuss the details with Ingo (is)
[2008-06-06 11:10:46] <sb> ...should be back from vacation after next week
[2008-06-06 11:11:01] <kendy> sb: OK, I'll file an issue.
[2008-06-06 11:11:46] <kendy> sb: Another thing, but most probably more a question to kr - is there any movement in the field of source split, please?
[2008-06-06 11:12:04] <kendy> sb: I mean building URE separately, etc.?
[2008-06-06 11:12:43] <sb> kendy: no movement from our side yet; are you moving ahead? [2008-06-06 11:13:17] <kendy> sb: I'd like to in the near future, but nothing at the moment :-(
[2008-06-06 11:13:37] <kendy> sb: I'll keep the [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[2008-06-06 11:13:54] <sb> kendy: great
[2008-06-06 11:14:14] <kendy> So - that's all from my side ;-)
[2008-06-06 11:15:00] <sb> xiuzhi: back to your question, you mean you want to split individual cxx files into multiple parts (not sure I understand your question)?
[2008-06-06 11:16:26] <xiuzhi> sb:sure
[2008-06-06 11:18:38] <sb> xihzhi: then there is no easy answer, I fear. you need a good idea what features to structure the code by, and then good skills to actually restructure the existing code along that new structure (and the two steps will probably go not one after the other, but in lockstep...)
[2008-06-06 11:19:57] <xiuzhi> sb: see. it is a little difficult.
[2008-06-06 11:20:13] <sb> xiuzhi: indeed ;)
[2008-06-06 11:21:04] <sb> I have no idea at all how I would tackle that myself... [2008-06-06 11:21:14] <xiuzhi> sb: and what is your further plan about the modulation after you split the brand, basis? [2008-06-06 11:22:07] <xiuzhi> sb: will you do the similar thing after that? [2008-06-06 11:22:25] <sb> xiuzhi: I personally have no plans there at all. You should best discuss that with kr (no idea why he did not join today), or with a broader audience (e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED]) [2008-06-06 11:22:59] <xiuzhi> sb: I want to discuss with you and Kay deeply if I would visit Hamburg in July
[2008-06-06 11:23:19] <xiuzhi> sb: ok, thanks,
[2008-06-06 11:23:35] <sb> xiuzhi: OK, I see. Lets do it face to face then. Probably easier ;)
[2008-06-06 11:24:04] <xiuzhi> have a good weekend, see you next time
[2008-06-06 11:24:21] <sb> oh, before I forget:
[2008-06-06 11:24:44] <sb> I will not be here for the scheduled date of the next meeting (July 4) [2008-06-06 11:25:17] <sb> so we will have to either drop it, move it, or find some volunteer to host it---opinions
[2008-06-06 11:25:30] <xiuzhi> when will you be in office in July?
[2008-06-06 11:25:46] <sb> only a one day vacation
[2008-06-06 11:25:49] <xiuzhi> maybe I can stay there for one week
[2008-06-06 11:26:09] <xiuzhi> ok
[2008-06-06 11:26:30] <pmladek> sb: I don't mind to move it by one day or week.
[2008-06-06 11:26:44] <xiuzhi> I will email you before that.
[2008-06-06 11:27:10] <sb> OK, so I'll schedule next meeting for July 11
[2008-06-06 11:27:25] <xiuzhi> ok
[2008-06-06 11:27:47] <xiuzhi> see you
[2008-06-06 11:27:55] <pmladek> sb: Sounds fine to me.
[2008-06-06 11:28:17] <--| xiuzhi has left #ooopackaging
[2008-06-06 11:28:18] <sb> bye!
[2008-06-06 11:28:26] <pmladek> bye!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to