Hi,
due to the trunk-only migration mentioned below, we do no longer have a
dependency on the first release candidate of OOo 3.0, which is done on
the OOO300 branch. At the same time, Heiner is ready to start the
migration. So do we want to start the migration now i.e. prior to the RC?
Regards,
Jörg
Jens-Heiner Rechtien schrieb:
Hi,
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Guido,
the migration is going nicely along. We do plan to migrate after the
3.0 RC.
- We've got a box, a Sun Fire 4150 (8 cores, 64 GB RAM, no less). The
URL will be svn.services.openoffice.org. An updated test repository
will be on that machine RSN.
- We'll use Subversion 1.5.1, that is with the build in merge tracking
- The ESC council decided after some debate about the migration scope,
aka how much history do we want
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Scm_migration_scope)
We will go along with option c) "trunk only", this will also help
with later DSCM options.
Some asked, so I probably should explain it in a bit more detail what we
mean with "trunk only" migration:
- only history on the main development line (trunk) will be migrated,
thus no branches and tags
- we'll migrate only files which are still active (nothing from
the CVS "Attic" directories)
- binary files will be pruned to the last version
- Localization files (*.sdf) will be pruned to the last version
Existing branches will be maintained in CVS. This includes the OOO300
branch, on which OpenOffice.org 3.0 will be released.
Heiner
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
