Hi Stefan, I would prefer hg.services.openoffice.org and not a generic one. We'll have to use at least svn and hg for a while in parallel and I would like to separate them completely.
Heiner Stefan Taxhet wrote: > Hi, > > I saw the discussion of the hostname in the comments. > > Do we want to go ahead with hg.services.openoffice.org or use something > more general like source.s.ooo or src.s.ooo? > Let's nail this down right from the beginning so that the svn.s.ooo > isn't abused ;-) > > Greetings > Stefan > > > Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on another project lately, but since this one is >> nearing finalization I'll have the time for the preparation of the >> Mercurial pilot RSN now. I'll announce the details here on the list. >> Some more details here: >> http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/mercurial_pilot_for_openoffice_org >> >> Heiner >> >> >> >> >> Martin Hollmichel wrote: >>> Hi *, >>> >>> The ESC meeting agreed more than a year ago to migrate OpenOffice.org's >>> version control from CVS via subversion towards an distributed source >>> code managment (DSCM) system. The ESC is also in agreement that right >>> now git and mercurial are both systems which are able to fulfil the >>> requirements we have but there is no vast majority towards one of the >>> systems. This is no real surprise since also other projects still don't >>> show a clear favorite. The ESC also is in agreement that we should >>> migrate now or in the very near future we can not afford to wait which >>> system will win the race. Since the release engineering team is in favor >>> of mercurial I ask - as the tools project lead - the RE team to start >>> the pilot for mercurial now so that we will be able to have the new DSCM >>> available with the 3.2 release. >>> This is not an easy decision. But we had the choice, this was possible >>> by the availability of the free, open source projects bzr, git and >>> mercurial. Thanks to them and the teams that worked on the evaluation >>> for an migration to OpenOffice.org. >>> This is not a decision against one of them because of technical >>> concerns, it is a pragmatic decision, >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Jens-Heiner Rechtien [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
