Hi Christian, Dne Friday 28 of August 2009 19:40:02 Christian Lohmaier napsal(a):
> >> Suggestions for a coherent nomenclature are welcome! > > > > Well, I was thinking the git way once again, sorry :-( > > > > But anyway, 'trunk' or 'main repository' (for DEV300), 'feature > > repository' (for OOO300, OOO310, ...), and 'release repository' (for > > CWSes) sound best to me. > > Oh, that is the exact opposite of my understanding. > OK with "main" for DEV300, but the OOO ones are the release ones, > that's where the releases are based on after all. And new features > won't be added on those. So calling OOO ones "feature branches" would > be confusing at best. > Similar for the cws - you won't buid a release based on a cws branch, > so thats a misnomer as well. Of course I meant "...'release repository' (for OOO300, OOO310, ...), and 'feature repository' (for CWSes)...", as already stated at the beginning of that mail where I wrote "CWS really means a 'feature branch', and MWS means a 'release branch'". Sorry for the confusion :-( Kendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
