Am Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:49:53 +0200 schrieb Jens-Heiner Rechtien <[email protected]>:
> > Again that would actually be just as trivial with hg if we would not > > have that "one head repos!!1!eleven!" dogma. For example a hook > > could simply pull from DEV300 before applying a changeset. Or even > > simpler a cronjob pulling from DEV300 to the cws repos regularly > > would solve the problem. > > > > IMHO most devs are able to handle a two-head (master and cws) repo > > easily by now. But I guess Heiner has another opinion. > > Most devs ..., yes. But we need everyone to handle this right. > Remember, there are non-devs who also need to work with the setup. > And, judging by the questions I have been answering lately, we aren't > yet there to try out the fancy stuff :-) Hmmm, how about a checkbox in EIS "automatically pull from master"? A cronjob could then automatically pull from master to all cws where the checkbox is set. Of cause, the checkbox is marked with "experimental, will eat your kitten, dont touch" so only the brave and few will use it and will be on their own when they make mistakes. How about that? Best Regards, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
