Do we really want to add a new API endpoint just to support the legacy
format? Couldn't we just provide a script that converts between the
two formats, similar to what we did for cdn.conf with
traffic_ops/app/bin/config2json?

- Rawlin
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:04 AM Robert Butts <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ah, excellent. It wasn't clear from the docs that `POST /api/1.2/profiles`
> and `GET /api/1.2/profiles/:id` accept parameters. We should fix that.
>
> That said, I would be in favor of adding a new endpoint, to import in the
> old format, `/api/profile/import-legacy` or something. Just so people with
> old exports can import them back in. Data jails are bad (I know it's
> human-readable and not that difficult to convert, but it'd still be
> frustrating).
>
> I made Github issues for both:
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2827
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2826
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:08 AM Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > yes -- that's really what I meant.   Import/Export should not be a separate
> > operation as documented here:
> >
> > https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/default_profiles.html?highlight=import
> > ,
> > but should be part of the "normal" API.  The default profile files we keep
> > in http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/downloads/profiles/ are in the format
> > I'm describing.   They should be in the more standard form and should
> > associate all parameters in the file with the profile.
> >
> > The Go `POST api/1.3/profiles` endpoint already loads the parameters into
> > memory,  but ignores the parameters list.
> >
> > -dan
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:58 AM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe this is what Dan said but imo there should be no import/export
> > > endpoints but these should do the job:
> > >
> > > GET /api/*/profiles/:id <-- this is essentially an export. it gives you
> > the
> > > json of a profile (along with all the parameters). save the json to a
> > file
> > > and you've essentially exported the profile.
> > > POST /api/*/profiles <-- this is how  you create profiles. if you supply
> > > parameters as well you've essentially done an import.
> > >
> > > jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:16 AM Robert Butts <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can you clarify, are you referring to `/profile/import` and
> > > > `/profile/:id/export`? Or `/api/$version/profiles/:id/export` and
> > > > `/api/$version/profiles/import`?
> > > >
> > > > We should definitely deprecate and remove the non-API endpoints. But
> > IMO
> > > we
> > > > need to keep a way to create and get an entire profile, with
> > parameters,
> > > in
> > > > a single request. Users shouldn't have to make a dozen requests to
> > import
> > > > and export a profile.
> > > >
> > > > Also +1 on changing them to real booleans (not sure if the api
> > > > export/import is, they appear to be undocumented). Though we can't
> > break
> > > > the current API; we could make the POST accept either, but the GET
> > would
> > > > have to be a new endpoint I think.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 3:15 PM Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I’d like to propose deprecating the import/export format of profiles.
> > > The
> > > > > current format (Perl-based) is inconsistent with the standard POST
> > > > > api/x.x/profiles format. Import/Export can/should be done using the
> > > same
> > > > > API.   Traffic Portal Import should use the standard API endpoint.
> > > > >
> > > > > Import/export (shown below) has this form which includes the
> > "profile"
> > > > key
> > > > > at the top level.  The "secure" option in the "parameters" secion
> > uses
> > > a
> > > > > 0/1 rather than a boolean true/false.  These 2 things make it
> > > > inconsistent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Opinions are welcome...
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > {
> > > > >     "profile": {
> > > > >        "name": "myname",
> > > > >        ...
> > > > >      },
> > > > >      "parameters": [
> > > > >            {
> > > > >                "name": "foo",
> > > > >                "secure": 0,
> > > > > ...
> > > > >     ]
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to