+1, I am fine with it. That table already has a lot of columns, what's one more!?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:59 PM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like server "notes" or a server "description". Seems like a fair > ask. I don't see the harm in adding an optional column to the server table > with type=text for this data. > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:16 PM Anuj Tyagi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Traffic Controllers, > > > > I discussed this with a couple of ATC users. We have multiple > > Description/text fields in Delivery Service configuration of TP. > Similarly, > > We should also have one text field in servers configuration. My use case > is > > to keep the service/serial id of the servers and any specific info for a > > server for which no field is available. > > > > I have created an issue on GitHub for it earlier: > > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2764 > > <https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2764> > > > > It's not a major change so shouldn't be a problem. If everyone agrees, > I'd > > be interested to add that. > > > > Thank you > > Anuj Tyagi > > >
