Since I haven't heard an objection, I'm going to declare consensus on the 
removal of this field from the data model.  Because the removal of this field 
would require a significant change to delivery services rooted in older 
versions of ATS which use it, I'm also going to declare this to be the 
deprecation notice in 3.x.

Jonathan Gray


On 1/22/19, 8:31 AM, "Gray, Jonathan" <[email protected]> wrote:

    If a deprecation notice would be needed, that's ok.  I would assume 
regardless there would need to be consensus first.  Then I can add this email 
thread to the ticket so we remember down the road.
    
    Jonathan G
    
    
    On 1/18/19, 1:41 PM, "Rawlin Peters" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        +1. The raw remap line sounds like a reasonable workaround for people
        still on ATS 6. That said, stuff like this typically requires a
        deprecation notice before removal.
        
        - Rawlin
        
        On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:58 AM Fieck, Brennan
        <[email protected]> wrote:
        >
        > +a million on not supporting a product that has reached it's EOL
        > (definitely not biased to set a precedent for Python 2)
        > ________________________________________
        > From: Gray, Jonathan <[email protected]>
        > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 9:42 AM
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Removal of CacheURL DS Field from ATC
        >
        > Hello all,
        >
        > I’d like to get consensus on 
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/3225 .  If we remove the 
CacheURL delivery service field, you can still  use ATS 6 if you must, you’ll 
just have to use the raw remap text field by hand instead of leaning on TO to 
generate the config for you.  That said, if you’re still on ATS 6 and are doing 
that, you’re better off upgrading to the more powerful cachekey plugin instead 
that is supported in ATS 6 and beyond.  As ATC supports newer versions of ATS, 
this is creating extra cruft for new users to stumble across and learn about 
the hard way not to do.
        >
        > Jonathan G
        
    
    

Reply via email to