Have we identified if Actions can support leveraging CIAB yet? That was the complicating factor when I looked at it after announcement.
Jonathan G On 8/5/19, 11:08 AM, "ocket 8888" <[email protected]> wrote: So it turns out actions will only run on master. I've opened a PR from the dev-actions branch: https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=f1b5f6661b10a314.f1b5d1d2-cd5d88fff0a394f3&u=https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/3774 so does anyone mind my doing that instead? Of course, if it does get merged I can delete my branch - or the merger can. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:06 AM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:01 AM Robert Butts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I'm in favor of being liberal with experimental things. Just name it > > something someone won't mistake for anything stable or release-ish, > > "dev-githubactions" or whatever. And delete it if/when you're no longer > > using it. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:22 AM Gray, Jonathan <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Nope, I've done similar things in the past for Jenkins (and it's on my > > > todo list again, so I'm curious what you find out). > > > > > > Jonathan G > > > > > > > > > On 8/2/19, 8:54 AM, "ocket 8888" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I wanted to mess around with GitHub actions for Traffic Control - > but > > > they're in beta and I haven't been granted access to them as a > GitHub > > > user. > > > But Apache as an organization has. So basically, I can mess with > them > > > on > > > the ATC repo, but not on my personal fork. > > > > > > For that purpose, I was wondering if anyone would have a problem > with > > > me > > > making a branch where I could tinker with it a bit? I can't imagine > > > how it > > > would affect anything outside of the branch, and at any rate the > > > branch can > > > be deleted at any point. > > > > > > > > > (GitHub Actions: https://github.com/features/actions) > > > > > > > > > > > >
