Thanks for preparing the RC ocket8888!

Since I think this is the first time we've attempted a release with
convenience binaries, can you share what you've done to ensure license
compliance with those new artifacts?

I'll do my best to get a vote together on the release in the next 3 days.

--Eric


On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 5:49 PM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared a release for v5.0.0-RC0
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Changes since 4.1.0:
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/compare/4.1.0...RELEASE-5.0.0-RC0
>
> This corresponds to git:
> Hash: d5ee85fdcd36b998573e8819b63c51764093dff9
> Tag: RELEASE-5.0.0-RC0
>
> Which can be verified with the following: git tag -v RELEASE-5.0.0-RC0
>
> My code signing key is available here:
>
> https://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?search=0xF5D560A373B76FA302A95DBFCDFE430685982C95&fingerprint=on&op=index
>
> Make sure you refresh from a key server to get all relevant signatures.
> Also, their SSL key seems messed up right now, so you might get a browser
> warning.
>
> The source .tgz file, pgp signature (.asc signed with my key from
> above), and sha512 checksums are provided here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/trafficcontrol/5.0.0/RC0
>
>
> Thanks!
> ocket8888 [email protected]
>

Reply via email to