Resending to make sure it's clear this is simply a proposal. Please provide feedback.
In the past, ATC has targeted quarterly official releases but we've failed on many occasions due to "holding the bus" for certain features or slow release voting. In the 10/26/2021 TC working group, we discussed that we should stick to this schedule regardless of feature readiness. (remember if you want a certain feature that was merged post-release, you can always pull from the master branch as we are all in agreement that master must ALWAYS be releasable). Here is the schedule that was proposed: - Quarterly minor releases (unless a Major is warranted and will be determined on case-by-case basis) - Monthly patch releases Example: 11/1/21: 6.0.1 12/1/21: 6.0.2 1/1/22: 6.1.0 2/1/22: 6.1.1 3/1/22: 6.1.2 4/1/22: 6.2.0 5/1/22: 6.2.1 6/1/22: 6.2.2 7/1/22: 6.3.0 8/1/22: 6.3.1 9/1/22: 6.3.2 10/1/22: 7.0.0 <-- Apparently something "big" or non backwards compatible got merged (i.e. API version removal) 11/1/22: 7.0.1 12/1/22: 7.0.2 Please provide feedback on this approach. Thanks, Jeremy
