+1 on RC5 too
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm sticking with my +1 as well.
>
> Rgds,
> JvD
>
>> On Dec 21, 2016, at 11:44, David Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I spot checked a few files that were missing license headers in RC4 and the
>> license was there. Since the only thing that changes between RCs was the
>> license files, I am going to rely on my original testing and vote +1.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> One correction: The signed source tarball and checksums are available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC5/
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC5/>
>>
>
