If it fits (bar the version number): "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image, video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the license is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh, provide more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on list). I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version. Hen On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote: > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM: > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be > > included in an Apache release? > > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit > into the product to be able to work on a reply. > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7 > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > [2]: > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing- > considerations/version4/ > > > -- > > - Shane > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
