I'll take a look at open PRs tomorrow and see if there is anything I want to make sure gets in. Other than that I am +1
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 16:06 Mark Torluemke <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree -- I think sooner-is-better for branching 2.0. > > Cheers, > Mark > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Jan van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +100 ! > > > > I really want to get some changes in to 2.1. > > > > Thanks, > > JvD > > > > > On Feb 20, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Eric Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey All- > > > Its about time to cut our first branch in the 2.0 series and starting > > > testing release candidates. > > > > > > TC1.8 is not quite yet through the incubator voting process, but it > > appears > > > that approval is hopefully quite close. No changes have gone into 1.8 > in > > > the past few months, so on top of the move to Postgres we have quite > the > > > set of changes in this upcoming release. > > > > > > > > > Unless I hear strong opinions otherwise in the next 2-3 days, I'll cut > > the > > > TC2.0 release branch later this week and bump the master version > numbers > > up > > > to 2.1 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eric > > > Release Manager-elect > > > > >
