+1 here as well

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Jan van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 based on my earlier vote.
>
> On Feb 19, 2017, at 6:42 PM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1, this shows that only license files changed:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Hank Beatty <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Looks like only licenses were changed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/17/2017 03:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC11).   I apologize for the
>>>> confusion on RC10 -- we had a glitch in our tagging process.  RC11 is
>>>> identical to RC10,  but we decided to redo the process to ensure the
>>>> integrity of the release.   The source tarballs are identical in
>>>> content -- only dates changed, but the checksums will be different.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11
>>>>
>>>> This corresponds to git:
>>>>   Hash: 14ef03fd251b6306e67627c935f9111efb0284af
>>>>   Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11
>>>>
>>>> Which can be verified with the following:    git tag -v
>>>> RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11
>>>>
>>>> My code signing key is available here:
>>>> http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?search=0x4587A8F0&op=vindex
>>>>
>>>> Make sure you refresh from a key server to get all relevant signatures.
>>>>
>>>> The source .tar.gz file, pgp signature (.asc signed with my key from
>>>> above), and md5 and sha1 checksums are provided here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC11
>>>>
>>>> (from RC10): This RC has only LICENSE file changes to eliminate 3rd
>>>> party URLs and
>>>> a small addition to NOTICE to cover binary font files.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will remain open until the evening of Monday, Feb 20, 2017 to
>>>> allow a full 72 hour vetting period.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to