With the API GW, such duplications, or modifications can be defined in the
GW, if required, instead of in TO

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 5:52 PM Jan van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:

> We should also think about the API gateway future.... I think with that, we
> don't need these special routes at all anymore, right Amir?
>
> Cheers,
> JvD
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:24 PM Dewayne Richardson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we should do as Dave mentioned, assess and rename.
> >
> > > On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:18 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't like duplicating routes either but I thought it would ease the
> > > transition rather than just changing the route. So no code duplication,
> > > just 2 routes that go to the same place:
> > >
> > > $r->get("/internal/api/$version/steering")->over( authenticated => 1
> > )->to(
> > > 'Steering#index', namespace => 'API::DeliveryService' );
> > > $r->get("/api/$version/steering")->over( authenticated => 1 )->to(
> > > 'Steering#index', namespace => 'API::DeliveryService' );
> > >
> > > And then we circle back and delete
> > >
> > > $r->get("/internal/api/$version/steering")->over( authenticated => 1
> > )->to(
> > > 'Steering#index', namespace => 'API::DeliveryService' );
> > >
> > > at some point.
> > >
> > > And yes, this internal namespace was introduced for comcast-specific
> > > reasons that I believe no longer exist.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:13 PM, David Neuman
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > At least a few of those (Steering, federations) were put in the
> > "internal"
> > > > namespace to work around Comcast specific issues. I don't know that I
> > like
> > > > the idea of duplicating routes, if anything we should see what is
> > impacted
> > > > by moving them out of the internal namespace.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Currently, we have a number of API routes scoped as "internal".
> Here
> > are
> > > > a
> > > > > few examples:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
> > > > > master/traffic_ops/app/lib/TrafficOpsRoutes.pm#L516
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe this is going to make it more difficult as we try to
> > implement
> > > > > more granular roles / capabilities coupled with tenancy.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I'm proposing that we create a duplicate non-internal route like
> > this,
> > > > > for example:
> > > > >
> > > > > $r->get("/api/$version/steering")->over( authenticated => 1 )->to(
> > > > > 'Steering#index', namespace => 'API::DeliveryService' );
> > > > >
> > > > > that way we can slowly move away from the "internal" routes and
> > > > eventually
> > > > > deprecate them.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think with our upcoming more robust role / tenancy model, there
> is
> > no
> > > > > longer a need for "internal".
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeremy
> > > > >
> > > >
>

Reply via email to