+1
I didn't realize it was new.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, David Neuman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Since the Cookie Jar functionality is new to 2.0 and 2.0 is not yet
> > released, why don't we just remove the `ResumeSession` method all
> together
> > and eliminate the dependency?  Otherwise we are deprecating something
> that
> > we never formally released.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Robert Butts <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Regarding `TC-119: traffic_ops/client dependency license issue`:
> >>
> >> It looks like the persistent cookie jar is only needed by Traffic Ops
> >> Client `ResumeSession(toURL string, insecure bool) (*Session, error)`.
> >> Nothing in Traffic Control uses `ResumeSession`, and I doubt anyone
> else is
> >> using it. Because it returns an error, and persisted cookies have
> >> lifetimes, any current users already must handle errors from persisted
> >> cookies being expired. Thus, we can change it to always return an error
> >> with only degraded performance (and not much, login is cheap), without
> loss
> >> of functionality.
> >>
> >> To fix TC-119, I propose we document `ResumeSession` as deprecated, and
> >> change it to always return an error, which lets us remove the
> dependency,
> >> without the development cost of writing our own persistent cookie store
> >> that no one is using.
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > These all got fixed and backported to 2.0:
> >> >
> >> > TC-203: Mojo doesn’t set cachable headers on public files”
> >> > TC-190: TTL type mismatch in CrConfig
> >> > TC-189: ssl_multicert.config too slow
> >> >
> >> > So Jan and Dave just need to close the issues.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jeffrey Martin <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Eric,
> >> > > I was going to address the immediate Postinstall issues TC-185. I am
> >> way
> >> > > late on this. I created a fork yesterday, need to run a couple of
> tests
> >> > and
> >> > > then I can push to this fork.
> >> > > Jeff Martin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
> >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > We have some release blockers for 2.0. Specifically:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > TC-119: traffic_ops/client dependency license issue
> >> > > >     We cannot ship with Category-X LGPL software, so I’m waiting
> for
> >> > this
> >> > > > to be resolved before cutting a release branch
> >> > > >  "TC-185 post install doesn’t run due to missing perl module”
> >> > > >     We shouldn’t ship a release in which the install process is
> >> broken
> >> > in
> >> > > > this way.
> >> > > >    *There’s no assignee yet for this, any volunteers?*
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I think if we can get those two taken care of we can cut an RC0
> later
> >> > > this
> >> > > > week.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Major bugs we will ship with (unless someone objects):
> >> > > >     TC-203: Mojo doesn’t set cachable headers on public files”
> >> > > >     TC-190: TTL type mismatch in CrConfig
> >> > > >     TC-189: ssl_multicert.config too slow
> >> > > >
> >> > > > —Eric
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 1:13 PM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Good question.  I would also like to see us try to get some
> release
> >> > > > > candidates out for 2.0.  I am pretty sure the actual install and
> >> > > > > postinstall need work.  There are also a couple of issue that
> are
> >> > still
> >> > > > > assigned to 2.0 and unresolved:
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC/fixforversion/
> >> > > > 12338562/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-
> >> > > > plugin:version-summary-panel
> >> > > > > .
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Jan van Doorn <[email protected]
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> When are we planning to release 2.0? We at Comcast are running
> >> what
> >> > we
> >> > > > >> call 2.0…. So we are +1, I am pretty sure.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Eric: are you waiting for something? Which cats need herding?
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Rgds,
> >> > > > >> JvD
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to