Thumbs up on removal
> On May 19, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> @Eric_Friedrich - any concerns from you regarding removal of these
> duplicate routes? Here they are to summarize:
>
> remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/list in favor of GET
> /api/$version/deliveryservices
> remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id/get in favor of GET
> /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id
> remove POST /api/$version/deliveryservices/create in favor of POST
> /api/$version/deliveryservices
> remove PUT /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id/update in favor of PUT
> /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id
> remove GET /api/$version/cachegroups/list in favor of GET
> /api/$version/cachegroups
> remove POST /api/$version/cachegroups/create in favor of POST
> /api/$version/cachegroups
> remove PUT /api/$version/cachegroups/:id/update in favor of PUT
> /api/$version/cachegroups/:id
> remove DELETE /api/$version/cachegroups/:id/delete in favor of DELETE
> /api/$version/cachegroups/:id
> remove POST /api/$version/servers/create in favor of POST
> /api/$version/servers
> remove PUT /api/$version/servers/:id/update in favor of PUT
> /api/$version/servers/:id
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Dewayne Richardson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> And as long as the "duplicate" routes point to the same Perl module, I'm ok
>> as well
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I assume you did a check of the client to make sure it wasn't using those
>>> routes?
>>> Other than that, no concerns here.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <
>> [email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As we move towards a new authorization model on the TO API which
>> includes
>>>> roles, capabilities and tenancy, it's important to remove any cruft
>> from
>>>> the API to ease this new implementation. I've put some effort into
>>>> organizing the TO routes file (
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
>>>> master/traffic_ops/app/lib/TrafficOpsRoutes.pm#L373)
>>>> but I'd also like to remove any duplicate routes.
>>>>
>>>> We have a few duplicates mainly in the area of deliveryservice,
>> servers,
>>>> and cachegroups. This jira outlines the duplicates and suggests which
>>>> routes to remove - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-82
>>>>
>>>> If these routes are being used, they would not be removed until 2.1
>>> giving
>>>> everyone time to use the standard ones.
>>>>
>>>> Concerns?
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>>
>>
