+1 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Dewayne Richardson <dewr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I thought we already had a vote on this? Maybe I am thinking of the > "move > > to github" vote which I assumed to be all-encompassing. > > Anyway, +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > > > <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > We currently use JIRA Issues to track all of the Traffic Control > bugs. > > > > > > > > Now that we have write access to Github, we can move back to GH > Issues > > > for bug tracking. > > > > > > > > This will be a better workflow because its one fewer tool and account > > to > > > have to interact with. This will hopefully lower the bar for new > > > contributors to file bugs and engage with the product. We can also help > > use > > > it (along with the milestones) to create more useful changelogs and > > release > > > notes. > > > > > > > > A possible downside is that the Issues are maybe less flexible than > > JIRA > > > in terms of permissions, workflow, fields, etc. However, we were using > > > Issues before we entered the incubator and that was fine for us. > > Hopefully > > > no one has developed an attachment for JIRA in the last year. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please Vote +1 to move to Github Issues or -1 to stay on Jira. I’ll > > > assume a lazy consensus if there aren’t enough votes. > > > > > > > > —Eric > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
