+1, I think the wiki is good for WIP and then once you submit a PR for the feature, put it in the docs. We probably should take some time to re-organize our docs.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Durfey, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say if it is work in progress it would go in the wiki. Once > formally released to open source it would go here: > http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/docs/latest/index.html . > > Ryan Durfey M | 303-524-5099 > CDN Support (24x7): 866-405-2993 or [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > > > From: "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 8:58 AM > To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: Anonymous IP Blocking Flowchart > > Where do we think our “design docs” (diagrams and text) belong? > > One option is the Wiki, but that can get stale so I’d toss it out there > that PRs should include the obvious user facing docs, but also a design doc > section as well > > -Eric > > > On Oct 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Jeff Elsloo <[email protected]<mailto:elsl > [email protected]>> wrote: > Hey Eric, > Thanks for sending this out. Hopefully we can build more of these > diagrams in the future to include in the docs. I'll try to put > something similar together for the stuff I've been working on. > -- > Thanks, > Jeff > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Just realized the first diagram I put up was outdated > The response to anonymous IP blocking is actually configurable between a > slate (302 redirect to a new URL) and a 403 > —Eric > On Oct 19, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Here is flowchart requested at the summit. I’ll put this diagram along > with the rest of the slides up soon > Its a link to a PNG despite the horribly formatted URL > https://cisco.box.com/s/4rwd6kk069vdmzxpp2ak0vt2elds0ufc > —Eric > > >
