Yes. Steve Malenfant signed it. Unfortunately, it looks like he is not in the "circle of trust" in the KEYS file. Does
that matter?
On 11/14/2017 02:47 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote:
I’m +1 as well
Checked out:
- signatures/checksums (Hank is your key signed yet?)
- licenses
- build
—Eric
On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Nir Sopher <n...@qwilt.com> wrote:
+1
We were able to build traffic-control, install and connect OPs, Portal-V2,
Monitor (Golang), Router and Stats.
Also got a redirect.
Note that I missed the last commit ("Change cdn.name to cdn.domain_name in
DeliveryServiceInfoForDomainList"), but as far as I see it could not break
the installation.
Nir
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
Thanks Matt-
I found another LEGAL ticket (https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/LEGAL-330) based on a Google version of the PATENTS file this
time.
Looks like things are OK to use then.
—Eric
On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Mills, Matthew <matthew_mi...@comcast.com<
mailto:matthew_mi...@comcast.com>> wrote:
FYI, Go itself has the same file
https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/PATENTS
On 11/14/17, 10:36:43 AM, "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <efrie...@cisco.com>
wrote:
I’ve been going through licensing for the 2.1 release and found this
file:
./traffic_stats/vendor/golang.org/x/net/PATENTS<http://
golang.org/x/net/PATENTS>
This looks like it places some of the same restrictions that caused the
whole Facebook React.js and rocksDb controversy a few months ago.
Fun reading here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-303
There’s some in depth discussion of the detailed Facebook license, I
can’t even begin to speculate how that compares to this Google conditional
patent grant.
We can see what the IPMC/Legal thinks or maybe just remove the code?
—Eric
