Thanks all for the replies, we've been considering collapsing all those
tables into a single one for "invalidate_content".  Just getting a feel for
it's use.

-Dew

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Steve Malenfant <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We haven't touched those tables @Cox. We use the built-in content
> invalidation.
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Hongfei Zhang (hongfezh) <
> [email protected]
> > wrote:
>
> > @Dew - we did not touch job_result table. Thanks, -Hongfei
> >
> > On 5/1/18, 5:03 PM, "Dewayne Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     @Hongfei
> >
> >     What about the "job_result" table?  It doesn't seem to be used at
> all.
> >
> >     - Dew
> >
> >     On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Hongfei Zhang (hongfezh) <
> > [email protected]
> >     > wrote:
> >
> >     > Hi Dew/Jan,
> >     >
> >     > We made some minor changes in content invalidation which were using
> >     > Job/Status - specifically we:
> >     > 1. added back CANCELLED job_status and added a Cancel subroutine
> in
> >     > API/Job.pm
> >     > 2. Exposed the cancel function via API endpoint DELETE
> >     > /api/$version/jobs/:id  - which calls above cancel()
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > -Hongfei
> >     >
> >     > On 5/1/18, 4:27 PM, "Jan van Doorn" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     I think they should be nuked.
> >     >
> >     >     Rgds,
> >     >     JvD
> >     >
> >     >     > On May 1, 2018, at 2:04 PM, Dewayne Richardson <
> > [email protected]>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I'm beginning to evaluate the Perl cleanup effort and noticed
> > that
> >     > the
> >     >     > *job_agent*, *job_status*, and *job_result* are minimally
> used
> >     > (except for
> >     >     > the "job" table which has the list of Purge Jobs").  I wanted
> > to get
> >     > a feel
> >     >     > for the usage outside of Comcast and what the sentiment is to
> > those
> >     > tables
> >     >     > (or not).
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > -Dew
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to