My vote is for libevent if we are going down this route, but agree with Leif that we should continue to have a native option available for those concerned with performance as opposed to portability. libevent seems to have the 'community' eyeballs at this time and seems to be actively maintained.
--Eric On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > That's been my impression as well. I like libev's API much more than > libevent's, but I was able to get libevent actually working much more > quickly than libev. AFAICT more projects use libevent when they actually > choose a library. > > > On 01/11/2009, at 1:12 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >>> What is libev's maturity level (actively maintained; adding features; >>> maintenance mode; no changes for over 1 year)? >> >> Certainly not as mature as libevent. But, I like libev's "model" better I >> think. > > -- > Mark Nottingham [email protected] > > >
