On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > up for vote is to decide on a policy for RTC ("Review-Then-Commit") vs CTR > ("Commit-Then-Review). Attached below are four options, ranging from the > most conservative to the most liberal. Please vote on this, I urge everyone > working with the source to vote within 72 hours. If you are only going to > vote on one thing, vote on this one. :) > > Vote on the following alternatives > ----------------------------------- > > [ ] RTC for everything except trivial changes (e.g. comments). > > [ ] RTC for everything, except very small changes which are CTR. > > [ ] RTC for everything, except code which would take ~5 minutes to review. > Such changes are CTR. > > [+1] CTR for trunk, RTC for all release branches.
CTR for trunk, RTC for stable/release branches makes the most sense for most server projects, and enables committers to easily do work in trunk without burdensome process.
