That code is now from Bind 9.5.2-P2 which has different license.
Unfortunately it seems that the code in the repo has the old
license still on it.
The correct license is
Copyright (C) 2004-2009 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
Copyright (C) 1996-2003 Internet Software Consortium.
Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ISC DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH
REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL ISC BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT,
INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM
LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE
OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR
PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
$Id: COPYRIGHT,v 1.13.130.2 2009/01/05 23:46:51 tbox Exp $
Portions Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Nominum, Inc.
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND NOMINUM DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL NOMINUM BE LIABLE FOR
ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT
OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
Or more precisely the subset of the above on the particular files.
I can make the changes in the trunk and 2.0.X... does this warrant
rebuilding the release package?
john
On 4/23/2010 3:21 PM, Miles Libbey wrote:
> Did we do anything with
> libinktomi++/ink_res_init.cc and
> libinktomi++/ink_res_mkquery.cc
> In the initial checkins they were flagged with BSD code (but with the
> advertising clause in the license).
> miles
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On 04/22/2010 10:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've prepared a package (and sigs) for a 2.0.0 release candidate.
>>> Please take a look at it, check STATUS/README/CHANGES, build and test
>>> it, verify the sigs, basically, make sure it's a solid release
>>> candidate. Since this is a 2.0.x release, only Linux is supported.
>>> When you are done, cast your +/-/0 votes, I'm aiming for a release on
>>> 4/28/2010, assuming no issues are found.
>>
>>
>> I think the comments so far are good, and we've already updated the Wiki
>> significantly (please make more updates to the Wiki pages as you test on
>> other Linux platforms, or with trunk, any Unix platforms). I will take
>> it upon myself of updating the README and INSTALL files on trunk with
>> the relevant information from the Wiki.
>>
>> That much said, I still think the canddiate is in a "shippable"
>> condition. So, a +1 from me.
>>
>> -- Leif
>>
