Late but
+1
-George
On 5/19/10 9:57 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 10:31 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
>> On 05/19/2010 09:14 AM, John Plevyak wrote:
>>> Yes we will change INXXX_MAX etc.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately int64 is not standard. So we have a couple alternatives.
>>>
>>> 1) use nonstandard types where
>>>
>>> typedef long long int int64;
>>> typedef int int32;
>>> typedef short int16;
>>> typedef char int8;
>>>
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> which work on every system and which permit seamless printf
>>> using %lld and %d. This is the way we do it now.
>>>
>>
>> +1 - This is the lesser of the evils...
>
>
> +1, less evil == good.
>
> -- leif
>
