Ah, yes, that is 64MB. The freelist is thread safe, although a missing "volatile" declaration caused it to fail to be so for the 32-bit version with recent versions of gcc. That is the reason to update to 2.1.8. Are you seeing your problem with a 32-bit or 64-bit build?
john On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, aniket ray <aniket....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, John Plevyak <jplev...@acm.org> wrote: > > There is no 64MB freelist unless you have created one yourself. The > buffer > > freelists max out at 2MB and unless you are caching files you should not > see > > them allocated. > > > > john > > > > I might have been mistaken but it seems ioBufAllocator[14] has a > type_size of 2M and a chunk_size of 32 (DEFAULT_HUGE_BUFFER_NUMBER) at > init_buffer_allocators(). > > This initializes a freelist that tries to memalign 2M * 32 each time a > MIOBuffer::write is called. > Is my understanding incorrect? Just to add, I haven't created any > freelists. > > Thanks, > -aniket > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:24 AM, aniket ray <aniket....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > On 05/24/2011 10:14 AM, aniket ray wrote: > >> >> > >> >> It's trafficserver 2.1.5-unstable > >> > > >> > Can you try v2.1.8, or even better, current trunk, I know we fixed > >> several > >> > bugs related to this code since v2.1.5. > >> > > >> I ported my plugin to the new version of ATS to get it running to test > >> the crasher on v2.1.8. I'm getting the exact same crash with the same > >> call stack. > >> > >> It seems that my thread safety diagnosis might not have been correct. > >> It is trying to allocate 64MB blocks at a time off the freelist till > >> memalign starts failing. Is this the expected behaviour? > >> > >> > -- leif > >> > > >> > Getting trunk: > >> > > >> > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/trunk/ > >> > > >> > >> I could not get this working. Does this need a specific version of > >> automake? I have 1.11. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -aniket > >> > > >
