----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > what do you guys think about eliminating the UDPNet stuff from the > core > and APIs (there are some old, "private" INK APIs related to UDP). I > suspect most (all?) of this is old code, related to the streaming > protocols that the core used to support. The only UDP code we have > (afaik) is DNS related, and I don't think it uses these APIs / > classes? > > Thoughts?
Is there any possible future use for UDP as protocol or rather for protocols in ATS - and how would we fare with the current state of the APIs? Can they be improved - or would they need a rewrite to be in any usable state anyway? How does ripping out UDP correlate with this project: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/HostDBandDNS > -- leif i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
