I wanted to know if anyone else has done testing on comparing how clfus and lru perform for real world traffic.
I noticed that a server using clfus and didn't have the cache filled was getting a higher ram cache hit rate then a server that had the cache full. That lead me to do a test with lru and clfus in production. All I did was switch the configuration option on one box and wait for the cache to fill up. The server running lru was getting 1/2 the ram cache misses. Also, this was confirmed by the amount of disk access the clfus server was doing to grab objects from the disk cache. -Bryan
