On Aug 19, 2013, at 3:53 AM, Igor Galić <i.ga...@brainsware.org> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Why would we document a list if missing features? > > because I think it's a better than an FAQ, and it's a > good start for scoping the project. Somethings are > missing because we didn't get to it yet, others are > missing because they can (or are supposed to be) > implemented by Plugins. Yet other features are missing > because they are not in the scope of the project. OK, that sounds reasonable, but I still object to a "deployment limitations" section. Perhaps a better way to do this would be to have a "Load Balancing paragraph", where you mention parent caching, SRV records, plugin development, etc. The information is valuable; you should present it neutrally without the negative framing. J
