On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Alan M. Carroll <a...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Friday, September 19, 2014, 10:12:29 AM, you wrote: > > >>> + sni_servername.release(); // otherwise we'll free the source string. > > >> Why don't you want to free the source string in this case? > > Because it's still in the source object and therefore it would be freed again > at some point in the future. Oh, because of the memcpy ... yeh