I think the name of the files is important for the tests. That's the input
to traffic_via and the contents are the expected output.

On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 3:22:25 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> > On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:00 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 1, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can someone look at this please?
> >>
> >> Unapproved licenses:
> >>
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/[u c s f p eS:tNc  i p s ]
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/[uIcRs f p eN:t cCHi p s ]
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/[uIcRs f p eN:t cCNi p s ]
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/[uScMsSf pSeN:t cCMi p sS]
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/[uScRs f p eN:t cCHi p s ]
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/long rubbish via code 24
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/rubbish
> >> ./cmd/traffic_via/tests/short
> >>
> >>
> >> This is from our nightly RAT report. If these are to be ignored (i.e.
> no license needed to be attached), then just add the entire tests/
> directory to the exclude file maybe?
> >
> > yes, we should add the entire directory
>
>
>
> Hmmm, the way RAT works, this might be difficult. It only matches against
> individual path components. So, we could exclude e.g.
>
>         ^tests$
>
>
> but, that would then also exclude the tsqa-new/tests  directory as well.
> The other option is to exclude  e.g.
>
>         ^[.*
>         rubbish
>         ^short$
>
> Or, we could try to rename the test files with some pattern that is easily
> regexed?
>
>
> Anyone have any good suggestions?
>
> — Leif
>
>

Reply via email to