> On Jul 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Alan Carroll > <solidwallofc...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: > > We're testing this in production now, although cautiously. I think it > important to note the VC migration is conceptual, not actual. As noted in the > original proposal on the wiki the important bits are removed from the old VC > and put in the new VC, the latter then being thread local.
Cool. amc explained to me that we’re actually not migrating VC (allocated data), but releasing the original VC, allocating a new one, and transferring the origin server socket. That makes a lot more sense, and falls nicely within the concept of NUMA awareness. Thanks, — leif
